Audi S6 2011 vs Skoda Superb 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audi S6 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Skoda Superb has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Audi S6 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Superb can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Skoda Superb also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 4.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 3.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 420 HP | 140 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 250 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 6.5 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 4.6 - 9.3 | |
|
Audi S6 petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Superb. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Audi S6 is larger, but lower. Audi S6 is 10 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi S6 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 603 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`580 | ~ 2`141 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi S6 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |