Audi S6 2014 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Audi S6 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 4.0 (petrol) | 3.0 - 6.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 450 HP | 247 - 468 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 347 - 624 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 seconds | 5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.5 - 14.7 | |
|
Audi S6 petrol engines consumes on average 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.77 m | |
| Audi S6 is 11 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi S6 is 31 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1554 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi S6 has 217 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Audi S6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi S6 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`590 | ~ 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 58 000 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi S6 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |