Audi S5 2011 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Audi S5
2011 - 2016
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 333 HP150 HP
Torque: 440 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.1 seconds9 seconds
Audi S5 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi S5 engine produces 183 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 230 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi S5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.16.2
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi S5 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi S5 could require 285 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 61 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway860 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Mazda 3 2013 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ...  More about Mazda 3 2013 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.47 m
Width: 1.85 m1.80 m
Height: 1.38 m1.45 m
Audi S5 is larger, but lower.
Audi S5 is 25 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi S5 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1263 litres
Audi S5 has more luggage capacity.
Audi S5 has 116 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi S5 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi S5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2951`835
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 18 4007800
Pros and Cons: Audi S5 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv