Audi S5 2011 vs Mazda 3 2011

 
Audi S5
2011 - 2016
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.0 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 333 HP105 HP
Torque: 440 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.1 seconds12.2 seconds
Audi S5 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi S5 engine produces 228 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 295 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi S5 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.16.4
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi S5 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi S5 could require 255 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 61 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway1050 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.46 m
Width: 1.85 m1.76 m
Height: 1.38 m1.45 m
Audi S5 is larger, but lower.
Audi S5 is 26 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 10 cm wider, while the height of Audi S5 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
980 litres1360 litres
Audi S5 has 140 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 380 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Audi S5 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi S5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`295 kg1`770 kg
Net weight:1`745 kg1`195 kg
Load capacity:550 kg575 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 17 8004600
Pros and Cons: Audi S5 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv