Audi S5 2011 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Audi S5) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 333 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Audi S5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi S5 engine produces 88 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, but torque is 160 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power Audi S5 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.2 | |
|
The Audi S5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi S5 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Audi S5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 84 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Audi S5 is smaller. Audi S5 is 7 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Audi S5 is 40 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 958 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
980 litres | 2013 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Audi S5 has 478 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 1033 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi S5 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Audi S5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`295 kg | 3`175 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi S5 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |