Audi S5 2007 vs Kia Cerato 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Audi S5 is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Cerato can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 4.2 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 354 HP | 126 - 156 HP | |
Torque: | 440 NM | 157 - 194 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 - 5.4 seconds | 9.3 - 11.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 - 12.0 | 6.7 - 7.8 | |
Audi S5 petrol engines consumes on average 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Cerato. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.40 m | |
Audi S5 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi S5 is 16 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 8 cm wider, while the height of Audi S5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 440 litres | |
Audi S5 has 15 litres more trunk space than the Kia Cerato. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi S5 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato, which means Audi S5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`153 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 15 000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi S5 has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |