Audi S5 2016 vs Dodge Charger 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Audi S5 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Dodge Charger can be equipped with front wheel drive and rear wheel drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Dodge Charger also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 3.0 | 3.6 - 6.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 354 HP | 296 - 707 HP | |
Torque: | 500 NM | 353 - 881 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 10.0 - 14.7 | |
Audi S5 petrol engines consumes on average 5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.69 m | 5.07 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.91 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.48 m | |
Audi S5 is smaller. Audi S5 is 38 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Audi S5 is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 467 litres | |
Audi S5 has 2 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi S5 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Dodge Charger. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`115 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 28 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi S5 has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |