Audi S5 2011 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engines: | 3.0 (petrol) | 3.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 333 HP | 245 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 315 - 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 seconds | 6.2 - 9.3 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover Sport are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Audi S5. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.2 - 15.0 | |
|
Audi S5 petrol engines consumes on average 6.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.12 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Audi S5 is smaller. Audi S5 is 7 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 26 cm narrower, while the height of Audi S5 is 42 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 958 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
980 litres | 2013 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Audi S5 has 478 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 1033 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi S5 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Audi S5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`295 kg | ~ 3`123 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`745 kg | ~ 2`540 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 550 kg | ~ 583 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi S5 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |