Audi S5 2011 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engines: | 3.0 (petrol) | 3.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 333 HP | 245 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 315 - 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 seconds | 6.2 - 9.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.2 - 15.0 | |
|
Audi S5 petrol engines consumes on average 6.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.12 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Audi S5 is smaller. Audi S5 is 7 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 26 cm narrower, while the height of Audi S5 is 42 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`295 | ~ 3`134 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi S5 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |