Audi S4 1997 vs Jaguar S-Type 1999

 
Audi S4
1997 - 1999
Jaguar S-Type
1999 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.7 Petrol3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 265 HP240 HP
Torque: 400 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.6 seconds7.5 seconds
Audi S4 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi S4 engine produces 25 HP more power than Jaguar S-Type, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Jaguar S-Type. Thanks to more power Audi S4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.010.3
The Jaguar S-Type is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi S4 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar S-Type, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi S4 could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 560 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
710 km on highway870 km on highway
Jaguar S-Type gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.86 m
Width: 1.73 m1.82 m
Height: 1.40 m1.44 m
Audi S4 is smaller.
Audi S4 is 38 cm shorter than the Jaguar S-Type, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Audi S4 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 440 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data810 litres
Audi S4 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi S4 has 70 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar S-Type. The Jaguar S-Type may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11 meters12.1 meters
The turning circle of the Audi S4 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Jaguar S-Type, which means Audi S4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0902`175
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data1600
Pros and Cons: Audi S4 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Jaguar S-Type has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv