Audi S4 2003 vs Volvo V40 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Audi S4 is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo V40 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 4.2 (petrol) | 1.6 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 344 HP | 102 - 200 HP | |
Torque: | 410 NM | 145 - 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 - 5.9 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 - 13.0 | 5.4 - 10.4 | |
Audi S4 petrol engines consumes on average 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.41 m | |
Audi S4 is larger. Audi S4 is 10 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi S4 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 471 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1421 litres | |
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi S4 has 29 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. This could mean that the Audi S4 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi S4 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Audi S4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`288 | ~ 1`789 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 7200 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi S4 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |