Audi S4 2016 vs Volvo S60 2018

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi S4
2016 - 2019
Volvo S60
2018 -
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Audi S4 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo S60 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 3.02.0

Performance

Power: 347 - 354 HP190 - 320 HP
Torque: 500 - 700 NM300 - 430 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.7 - 4.8 seconds4.4 - 7.1 seconds
In general, Audi S4 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volvo S60. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.2 - 7.50.8 - 8.7
Audi S4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.76 m
Width: 1.84 m1.85 m
Height: 1.40 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi S4 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi S4 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres442 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
965 litresno data
Audi S4 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters12.1 meters
The turning circle of the Audi S4 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Audi S4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 2`258 kg~ 2`419 kg
Net weight:~ 1`705 kg~ 1`880 kg
Load capacity:~ 553 kg~ 539 kg
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data27 200
Pros and Cons: Audi S4 has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Volvo S60 has
  • also available in 2WD
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv