Audi S3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016

 
Audi S3
2016 - 2018
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 310 HP120 HP
Torque: 380 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.6 seconds10.3 seconds
Audi S3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi S3 engine produces 190 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi S3 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.45.6
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi S3 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi S3 could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway1060 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.58 m
Width: 1.80 m1.78 m
Height: 1.39 m1.45 m
Audi S3 is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi S3 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres419 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Audi S3 has 29 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi S3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi S3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`020 kg1`835 kg
Net weight:1`470 kg1`240 kg
Load capacity:550 kg595 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 31 80010 800
Pros and Cons: Audi S3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv