Audi S3 2001 vs Suzuki Baleno 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 96 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Audi S3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi S3 engine produces 129 HP more power than Suzuki Baleno, whereas torque is 146 NM more than Suzuki Baleno. Thanks to more power Audi S3 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.3 | |
|
The Suzuki Baleno is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi S3 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi S3 could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Audi S3 is larger. Audi S3 is 26 cm longer than the Suzuki Baleno, 7 cm wider, while the height of Audi S3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1020 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi S3 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno, which means Audi S3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi S3 has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |