Audi S3 2000 vs Kia Shuma 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 210 HP | 114 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 152 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Audi S3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi S3 engine produces 96 HP more power than Kia Shuma, whereas torque is 118 NM more than Kia Shuma. Thanks to more power Audi S3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.0 | |
Audi S3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Shuma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi S3 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
Audi S3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.16 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Audi S3 is 37 cm shorter than the Kia Shuma, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 440 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1020 litres | 1207 litres | |
Kia Shuma has more luggage space. Audi S3 has 170 litres less trunk space than the Kia Shuma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Shuma (by 187 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi S3 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Kia Shuma, which means Audi S3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`935 | 1`645 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5400 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi S3 has
|
Kia Shuma has
| |