Audi S3 2000 vs Kia Shuma 2001

 
Audi S3
2000 - 2001
Kia Shuma
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 210 HP114 HP
Torque: 270 NM152 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 seconds10.6 seconds
Audi S3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi S3 engine produces 96 HP more power than Kia Shuma, whereas torque is 118 NM more than Kia Shuma. Thanks to more power Audi S3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.19.0
Audi S3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Shuma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi S3 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle550 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway690 km on highway
Audi S3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.16 m4.53 m
Width: 1.76 m1.72 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Audi S3 is 37 cm shorter than the Kia Shuma, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1020 litres1207 litres
Kia Shuma has more luggage space.
Audi S3 has 170 litres less trunk space than the Kia Shuma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Shuma (by 187 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Audi S3 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Kia Shuma, which means Audi S3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9351`645
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 5200no data
Pros and Cons: Audi S3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
Kia Shuma has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv