Audi S3 2016 vs Kia RIO 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Audi S3 is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia RIO can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 310 HP | 100 - 123 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 132 - 151 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 - 5.3 seconds | 10.3 - 12.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 7.0 | 5.7 - 6.6 | |
Audi S3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia RIO. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.47 m | |
Audi S3 is larger, but lower. Audi S3 is 7 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi S3 is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 480 litres | |
Kia RIO has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi S3 has 90 litres less trunk space than the Kia RIO. This could mean that the Audi S3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi S3 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia RIO, which means Audi S3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`000 | ~ 1`588 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 45 000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi S3 has
|
Kia RIO has
| |