Audi S3 2013 vs BMW 3 series 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi S3
2013 - 2016
BMW 3 series
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Audi S3 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW 3 series also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 (petrol)1.6 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 300 HP116 - 313 HP
Torque: 380 NM220 - 630 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.9 - 5.3 seconds4.8 - 11.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.9 - 7.04.1 - 8.2
On average, the Audi S3 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as BMW 3 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.62 m
Width: 1.80 m1.81 m
Height: 1.39 m1.43 m
Audi S3 is smaller.
Audi S3 is 16 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi S3 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres480 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Audi S3 has 90 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: no data11.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`990~ 2`024
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 24 80011 600
Pros and Cons: Audi S3 has
  • only petrol engines available
BMW 3 sērija has
  • also available in 2WD
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv