Audi S3 2016 vs Audi TT 2014

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi S3
2016 -
Audi TT
2014 - 2018
Body: HatchbackCoupe
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Audi S3 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi TT also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.02.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 310 HP230 - 400 HP
Torque: 380 NM370 - 480 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.6 - 5.3 seconds3.7 - 6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 7.05.9 - 8.2
Audi S3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi TT.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.18 m
Width: 1.79 m1.83 m
Height: 1.40 m1.35 m
Audi S3 is 14 cm longer than the Audi TT, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Audi S3 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 340 litres305 litres
Audi S3 has more luggage capacity.
Audi S3 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.96 meters
The turning circle of the Audi S3 is 0.06 metres less than that of the Audi TT.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`008~ 1`735
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): no data19 200
Pros and Cons: Audi S3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Audi TT has
  • also available in 2WD
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv