Audi S3 2016 vs Audi TT 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Audi S3 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi TT also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Audi TT is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 HP | 180 - 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 250 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 - 5.3 seconds | 3.7 - 7.1 seconds | |
| In general, Audi S3 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Audi TT. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 7.0 | 4.4 - 8.2 | |
|
Audi S3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.35 m | |
| Audi S3 is 14 cm longer than the Audi TT, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Audi S3 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1060 litres | 712 litres | |
|
Audi S3 has more luggage capacity. Audi S3 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi S3 (by 348 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi S3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi TT. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`008 kg | ~ 1`693 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`418 kg | ~ 1`272 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 590 kg | ~ 421 kg | |
| Audi S3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem more than Audi TT. Therefore, Audi S3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 20 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi S3 has
|
Audi TT has
| |