Audi S3 2013 vs Kia Ceed 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi S3 is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Ceed can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 90 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 137 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 5.3 seconds | 7.7 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 7.0 | 3.7 - 7.6 | |
|
Audi S3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Audi S3 is larger, but lower. Audi S3 is 1 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi S3 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 365 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1318 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Audi S3 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Audi S3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi S3 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`510 | ~ 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi S3 has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |