Audi S3 2008 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi S3 is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Alfa Romeo MiTo can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 78 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 120 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 seconds | 7.5 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 4.3 - 6.5 | |
|
Audi S3 petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo MiTo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Audi S3 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi S3 is 24 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi S3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 950 litres | |
|
Audi S3 has more luggage capacity. Audi S3 has 32 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi S3 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means Audi S3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`055 | ~ 1`629 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi S3 has
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
| |