Audi S3 2006 vs Nissan Tiida 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Audi S3 is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Tiida can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 | 1.6 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 265 HP | 110 - 126 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 147 - 173 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 6.8 - 7.8 | |
Audi S3 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Tiida. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.54 m | |
Audi S3 is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan Tiida, 7 cm wider, while the height of Audi S3 is 14 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 281 litres | 272 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 467 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Audi S3 has 9 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Tiida. The Nissan Tiida may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi S3 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Tiida, which means Audi S3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`015 | ~ 1`658 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 8800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi S3 has
|
Nissan Tiida has
| |