Audi S3 2006 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Audi S3 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Colt has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Audi S3 is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Colt can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 265 HP | 75 - 109 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 seconds | 9.9 - 13.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 4.6 - 6.2 | |
Audi S3 petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 3.87 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.55 m | |
Audi S3 is larger, but lower. Audi S3 is 35 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 7 cm wider, while the height of Audi S3 is 15 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 281 litres | 220 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 854 litres | |
Audi S3 has more luggage capacity. Audi S3 has 61 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi S3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`015 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 8600 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi S3 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |