Audi S3 2000 vs Suzuki Baleno 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi S3 is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Suzuki Baleno can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 | 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 - 225 HP | 96 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 280 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 - 6.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 9.4 | 7.3 | |
|
Audi S3 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Baleno. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Audi S3 is larger. Audi S3 is 26 cm longer than the Suzuki Baleno, 7 cm wider, while the height of Audi S3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1020 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi S3 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno, which means Audi S3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`958 | ~ 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi S3 has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |