Audi S3 2000 vs Kia RIO 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Audi S3 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Kia RIO has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Audi S3 is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia RIO can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 | 1.3 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 210 - 225 HP | 75 - 108 HP | |
Torque: | 270 - 280 NM | 115 - 140 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 - 6.9 seconds | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 9.4 | 7.2 - 8.7 | |
Audi S3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia RIO. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.16 m | 4.22 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
Audi S3 is 6 cm shorter than the Kia RIO, 8 cm wider, while the height of Audi S3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 499 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1020 litres | 1277 litres | |
Kia RIO has more luggage space. Audi S3 has 229 litres less trunk space than the Kia RIO. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia RIO (by 257 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi S3 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Kia RIO, which means Audi S3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`958 | ~ 1`468 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 5200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi S3 has
|
Kia RIO has
| |