Audi Q7 2015 vs Dodge Durango 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 333 HP | 294 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi Q7 engine produces 39 HP more power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 87 NM more than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 11.2 | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi Q7 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Audi Q7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Durango engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A7 | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi Q7 2015 3.0 engine: The introduction of new cast-iron cylinder liners has nearly eliminated the issue of cylinder scoring. However, catalytic converters remain highly susceptible to damage from low-quality fuel and continue to ... More about Audi Q7 2015 3.0 engine Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles. After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
| Audi Q7 is 11 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q7 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 770 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 770 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1955 litres | 2410 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Audi Q7 has more luggage space (by 280 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 455 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Dodge Durango. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`910 | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 400 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |