Audi Q7 2015 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 4.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 339 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
| Audi Q7 engine produces 67 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Despite less power, Audi Q7 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q7 consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Audi Q7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q7 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1390 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1570 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A4 | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.84 m | |
| Audi Q7 and Land Rover Range Rover are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 770 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 770 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1955 litres | 2030 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 75 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`940 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 38 800 | 51 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |