Audi Q7 2015 vs Land Rover Discovery 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q7 engine produces 14 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Audi Q7 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q7 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the Audi Q7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q7 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1390 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1570 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q7 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A4 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.85 m | |
| Audi Q7 is 4 cm longer than the Land Rover Discovery, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Audi Q7 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 770 litres | 258 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 770 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1955 litres | 2406 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 451 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`940 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q7 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 000 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |