Audi Q7 2015 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 6.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Audi Q7) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Tahoe) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 426 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 624 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi Q7 engine produces 154 HP less power than Chevrolet Tahoe, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 12.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 13.5 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q7 consumes 6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means that by driving the Audi Q7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 900 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q7 consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 98 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1390 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1570 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.04 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Audi Q7 is smaller. Audi Q7 is 18 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Tahoe, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi Q7 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 770 litres | 433 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 770 litres | 433 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1955 litres | 2681 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Audi Q7 has more luggage space (by 337 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 726 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means Audi Q7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`940 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 200 | 61 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |