Audi Q7 2015 vs BMW X6 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 5.8 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 is a more dynamic driving. Audi Q7 engine produces 41 HP less power than BMW X6, whereas torque is 30 NM less than BMW X6. Due to the lower power, Audi Q7 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi Q7 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that by driving the Audi Q7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi Q7 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1390 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| 1570 km on highway | 1460 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q7 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A4 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X6 2014 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X6 2014 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Audi Q7 is 10 cm longer than the BMW X6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi Q7 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 770 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 770 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1955 litres | 1525 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 430 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X6, which means Audi Q7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`940 | 2`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Audi Q7 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X6 has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Audi Q7, so Audi Q7 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 34 800 | 31 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
BMW X6 has
| |