Audi Q7 2009 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 347 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q7 engine produces 6 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 13 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Despite less power, Audi Q7 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 11.4 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi Q7 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q7 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Audi Q7 is larger, but lower. Audi Q7 is 27 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q7 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 775 litres | 457 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2035 litres | 1554 litres | |
|
Audi Q7 has more luggage capacity. Audi Q7 has 318 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 481 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Audi Q7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`030 | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |