Audi Q7 2009 vs Dodge Durango 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 294 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi Q7 engine produces 14 HP less power than Dodge Durango, but torque is 7 NM more than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 11.2 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi Q7 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q7 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
| Audi Q7 is 2 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q7 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 775 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 775 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2035 litres | 2410 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 375 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Dodge Durango, which means Audi Q7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`030 | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |