Audi Q7 2009 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
| Audi Q7 engine produces 15 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volvo XC90. Despite the higher power, Audi Q7 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q7 consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q7 could require 495 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q7 consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Audi Q7 is 14 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Audi Q7 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 775 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2035 litres | 1886 litres | |
|
Audi Q7 has more luggage capacity. Audi Q7 has 160 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 149 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |