Audi Q7 2009 vs Nissan Navara 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q7 engine produces 66 HP more power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 147 NM more than Nissan Navara. Thanks to more power Audi Q7 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q7 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q7 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q7 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Audi Q7 is 13 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 13 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q7 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 775 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2035 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Audi Q7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |