Audi Q7 2009 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 168 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 402 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi Q7 engine produces 72 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 148 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 75 litres | |
| 890 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 775 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2035 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |