Audi Q7 2009 vs Mazda CX-9 2009

 
Audi Q7
2009 - 2015
Mazda CX-9
2009 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.7 Petrol

Performance

Power: 240 HP273 HP
Torque: 550 NM367 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 secondsn/a seconds
Audi Q7 engine produces 33 HP less power than Mazda CX-9, but torque is 183 NM more than Mazda CX-9.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.112.9
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi Q7 consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that by driving the Audi Q7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 100 litres76 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1090 km in combined cycle580 km in combined cycle
1280 km on highway670 km on highway
Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)
Ground clearance: 205 mm (8.1 inches)203 mm (8 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 5.09 m5.09 m
Width: 1.98 m1.94 m
Height: 1.74 m1.73 m
Audi Q7 is larger.
Audi Q7 and Mazda CX-9 are practically the same length.
Seats: 5 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 775 litres487 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data487 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 775 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2035 litres2852 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 817 litres).
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-9, which means Audi Q7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`2002`062
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 17 20010 200
Pros and Cons: Audi Q7 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mazda CX-9 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv