Audi Q7 2009 vs Mazda CX-9 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 240 HP | 273 HP | |
Torque: | 550 NM | 367 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Audi Q7 engine produces 33 HP less power than Mazda CX-9, but torque is 183 NM more than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 12.9 | |
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi Q7 consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that by driving the Audi Q7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 76 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
1280 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.09 m | 5.09 m | |
Width: | 1.98 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
Audi Q7 is larger. Audi Q7 and Mazda CX-9 are practically the same length. | |||
Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 775 litres | 487 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 775 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2035 litres | 2852 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 817 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-9, which means Audi Q7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`062 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 15 600 | 10 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |