Audi Q7 2009 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 4.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Audi Q7 engine produces 73 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Audi Q7 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
| By specification Audi Q7 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Audi Q7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 775 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2035 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |