Audi Q7 2009 vs BMW X5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Audi Q7 engine produces 5 HP less power than BMW X5, but torque is 10 NM more than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Audi Q7 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q7 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q7 could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q7 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| BMW X5 2010 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X5 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Audi Q7 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi Q7 is 23 cm longer than the BMW X5, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q7 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 775 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2035 litres | 1750 litres | |
|
Audi Q7 has more luggage capacity. Audi Q7 has 155 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 285 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Audi Q7 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 2`755 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`320 kg | 2`075 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 880 kg | 680 kg | |
| Audi Q7 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem more than BMW X5. Therefore, Audi Q7 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Audi Q7 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Audi Q7, so Audi Q7 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
BMW X5 has
| |