Audi Q7 2006 vs Dodge Durango 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 350 HP | 349 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 509 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi Q7 engine produces 1 HP more power than Dodge Durango, but torque is 69 NM less than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.6 | 14.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 16.1 l/100km | 14.0 l/100km | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi Q7 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Audi Q7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi Q7 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.89 m | |
| Audi Q7 is 1 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q7 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 775 litres | 532 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 775 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2035 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`935 | 2`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Durango has
| |