Audi Q7 2019 vs Mazda CX-9 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 340 HP | 231 HP | |
Torque: | 500 NM | 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Audi Q7 engine produces 109 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.8 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 74 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.06 m | 5.08 m | |
Width: | 1.97 m | 1.97 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q7 is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 740 litres | 407 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 740 litres | 407 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1925 litres | 2017 litres | |
In 7-seat version Audi Q7 has more luggage space (by 333 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 92 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-9, which means Audi Q7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`950 | 2`640 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 56 400 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |