Audi Q7 2020 vs Mazda CX-9 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Hybrid | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi Q7 engine produces 109 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 74 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q7 is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 407 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 407 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 650 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1835 litres | 2017 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 182 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-9, which means Audi Q7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`025 | 2`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 56 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |