Audi Q7 2020 vs Mazda CX-9 2016
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Hybrid | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Audi Q7) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Mazda CX-9) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi Q7 engine produces 90 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 2.7 l/100km + 22.2 kWh/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 11.70 € | 16.50 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 74 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q7 is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 407 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 407 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 650 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1835 litres | 2017 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 182 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-9, which means Audi Q7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`025 kg | 2`640 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`375 kg | 1`969 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 650 kg | 671 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 43 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |