Audi Q7 2019 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q7 engine produces 6 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Audi Q7 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.8 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi Q7 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q7 could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Audi Q7 is 11 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Audi Q7 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 865 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 865 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1925 litres | 1886 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Audi Q7 has more luggage space (by 615 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 39 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Audi Q7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`830 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 53 800 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |