Audi Q7 2019 vs Mazda CX-9 2016

 
Audi Q7
2019 -
Mazda CX-9
2016 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 231 HP231 HP
Torque: 500 NM420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.1 secondsn/a seconds
Audi Q7 and Mazda CX-9 have the same engine power, but Audi Q7 torque is 80 NM more than Mazda CX-9.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.18.8
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi Q7 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that by driving the Audi Q7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres74 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway830 km on highway
Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dimensions

Length: 5.06 m5.08 m
Width: 1.97 m1.97 m
Height: 1.74 m1.75 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q7 is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Seats: 7 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 865 litres407 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 865 litres407 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1925 litres2017 litres
In 7-seat version Audi Q7 has more luggage space (by 458 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 92 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.5 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-9, which means Audi Q7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`8302`640
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 56 400no data
Pros and Cons: Audi Q7 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mazda CX-9 has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv