Audi Q7 2019 vs Dodge Durango 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Audi Q7) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Dodge Durango) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 294 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi Q7 engine produces 63 HP less power than Dodge Durango, but torque is 147 NM more than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 11.2 | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi Q7 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Audi Q7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
| Audi Q7 is 5 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q7 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 740 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 740 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1925 litres | 2410 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Audi Q7 has more luggage space (by 250 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 485 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`830 kg | 2`948 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`165 kg | 2`184 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 665 kg | 764 kg | |
| Audi Q7 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Dodge Durango. Therefore, Dodge Durango is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 43 800 | 25 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |