Audi Q7 2015 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 4.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 339 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
| Audi Q7 engine produces 90 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 8.7 | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi Q7 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Audi Q7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1340 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1490 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.84 m | |
| Audi Q7 is 5 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Audi Q7 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 770 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 770 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1955 litres | 2030 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 75 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 800 | 47 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |