Audi Q7 2015 vs Volvo XC90 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Audi Q7) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo XC90) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 252 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q7 engine produces 17 HP more power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 110 NM less than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Audi Q7 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 5.7 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi Q7 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q7 could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 770 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 770 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1955 litres | 1886 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Audi Q7 has more luggage space (by 520 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 69 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 400 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |