Audi Q7 2015 vs Volvo XC90 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Audi Q7 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 - 333 HP | 190 - 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 - 600 NM | 350 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 7.1 seconds | 5.6 - 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.1 | 2.1 - 8.1 | |
|
Audi Q7 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Audi Q7 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.03 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q7 is 8 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 3 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q7 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 770 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1955 litres | 1886 litres | |
|
Audi Q7 has more luggage capacity. Audi Q7 has 155 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 69 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q7 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`844 | ~ 2`880 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 600 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q7 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |