Audi Q5 2012 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 580 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q5 engine produces 75 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 230 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Thanks to more power Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q5 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q5 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q5 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A7 | Used also on Jeep Renegade | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi Q5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q5 and Jeep Cherokee are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 412 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1560 litres | no data | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage capacity. Audi Q5 has 128 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`470 | 2`475 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q5 has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |