Audi Q5 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 580 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q5 engine produces 85 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 230 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q5 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q5 could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q5 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Audi Q5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A7 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi Q5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.10 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Audi Q5 is 2 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Audi Q5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1560 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi Q5 has 49 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Audi Q5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q5 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`470 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q5 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |