Audi Q5 2012 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Audi Q5) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Mitsubishi Outlander) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 580 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q5 engine produces 124 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 390 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 1.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 12.20 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 2360 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Audi Q5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A7 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi Q5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Audi Q5 is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 10 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1560 litres | no data | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q5 is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Audi Q5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`470 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`860 kg | 1`810 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 610 kg | 500 kg | |
| Audi Q5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Therefore, Audi Q5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q5 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |