Audi Q5 2012 vs Citroen C-Crosser 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 580 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q5 engine produces 89 HP more power than Citroen C-Crosser, whereas torque is 200 NM more than Citroen C-Crosser. Thanks to more power Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi Q5 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser, which means that by driving the Audi Q5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi Q5 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Audi Q5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C-Crosser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A7 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C-Crosser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Audi Q5 is 2 cm shorter than the Citroen C-Crosser, 9 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q5 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 540 litres | 441 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1560 litres | 1686 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Audi Q5 has more luggage space (by 99 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 126 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q5 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen C-Crosser, which means Audi Q5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`470 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q5 has
|
Citroen C-Crosser has
| |