Audi Q5 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 225 HP | 171 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 233 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Audi Q5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q5 engine produces 54 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 117 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.3 | |
Audi Q5 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Audi Q5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
1080 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 25 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A5 | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Audi Q5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
Audi Q5 is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 8 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q5 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 497 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1560 litres | no data | |
Audi Q5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi Q5 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi Q5 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Audi Q5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`365 | 2`070 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | below average | |
Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 26 400 | 11 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q5 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |